Skip to content
induwara.lk
induwara.lkAI · Deep research

AI Deep Research Comparison, ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Perplexity vs Claude vs Grok

Compare the 5 agentic deep-research modes side by side, price, free-tier runs, monthly run limits, citations, report length and document export. Set your budget and use case for a single best-fit pick. Every figure cites its official source.

By Induwara AshinsanaUpdated Jul 5, 2026
Find your deep-research tool5 tools
Quick scenarios

Your needs

$

Consumer plans only. Range $0–$300.

Report depth, document export, then citation quality.

Whole number. How many deep reports you'll run monthly.

Must-have features

Best match

RecommendedGemini Deep Research· Google
Google AI Pro plan
$19.99/mo
Runs / month
300
Indicative LKR
Rs 5,997/mo

Gemini Deep Research leads for academic work on report depth and export to Google Docs, at $19.99/mo.

Official source
Runner-upChatGPT Deep ResearchPlus · $20.00/mo · 25 runs/mo

Full comparison

ToolDeep research from
ChatGPT Deep Research
OpenAI
OpenAI o3 / GPT-5 deep-research model
$20.00/mo
Gemini Deep Research
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro (Deep Research agent)
$19.99/mo
Perplexity Deep Research
Perplexity AI
In-house reasoning stack over Sonar + frontier models
Free
Claude Research
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5 / Sonnet 4.5 (Research mode)
$20.00/mo
Grok DeepSearch
xAI
Grok 4 (DeepSearch agent)
Free

Each row's claims trace to its official source, see the Sources section below the tool.

AI search vs deep research

AI search answers in seconds from a handful of pages, great for a quick fact with a couple of links.

Deep researchruns an agent for several minutes across tens of sources and returns a long, structured, cited report. It's what this page compares.

Static comparison, nothing is sent to any AI provider.

The recommender only filters and ranks the figures below in your browser; no account, key or query leaves this page. Vendor limits change fast, every figure is dated (2026-07-05) and links to its official source. LKR is indicative at Rs 300/USD.

How it works

“Deep research” is the agentic mode in a chatbot that spends several minutes reading tens of web pages and then writes a long, structured, cited report, a different job from quick AI search, which answers in seconds from a handful of pages. This page lines up the five modes a Sri Lankan student, analyst or freelancer actually chooses between: ChatGPT Deep Research, Gemini Deep Research, Perplexity Deep Research, Claude Research and Grok DeepSearch.

1. The dataset

The comparison is a curated, cited table, not a benchmark and not an opinion score. Each row records the underlying model, the cheapest plan that unlocks deep research, the free-tier allowance, the paid run limit, typical report length, citation style, export targets, private-data connectors and real-time-web access, taken straight from the vendor's own pages. Because deep-research limits change often, every figure is dated with a 2026-07-05 LAST_VERIFIED stamp.

2. The recommender

The tool is a transparent, rules-based recommender, no live API calls, no scoring model. It runs in two steps:

  1. Filter.For each tool it finds the cheapest plan whose price is within your budget, whose monthly run limit meets your minimum, and, if you asked, is free. Tools without document export or private connectors are dropped when you require those. A tool with no qualifying plan is set aside as a “near miss” with the exact constraint it failed.
  2. Rank.Survivors are sorted by a key order tied to your use case, Academic report leads on report depth then export then citation quality; Market research leads on runs per month then sources per run; News & real-time leads on live-web freshness. Ties break by lower price, then more runs.

The top survivor becomes the recommendation and the second the runner-up. If nothing clears every filter, the tool shows the nearest options and which constraint each fails, so the page never dead-ends.

3. The LKR line is indicative

The recommendation card multiplies the USD plan price by a fixed CBSL middle rate of Rs 300per USD to show an approximate rupee cost. This is a constant, not a live feed, your bank's rate plus FX margin will differ by a few percent. For a live USD-to-LKR rate with Wise, Payoneer and Skrill fees, use the Freelancer USD-LKR calculator in Related tools.

4. Cross-checks

The data module exports verifyWorkedExamples() , which recomputes the worked examples below, including the fractional budget, negative-input error, runs-boundary and no-match cases, and verifyDatasetIntegrity(), which asserts unique ids, non-negative prices and runs, axis scores in range, and an https source on every row. A typo in a quarterly price update fails a test instead of shipping silently.

Worked examples

Undergrad literature review, $20, academic, needs export

A UCSC final-year student has Rs 6,000/month and wants a long cited report they can drop into a document, with at least 10 runs a month.

  1. Inputs: budget = $20, use case = Academic report, document export = on, min runs = 10.
  2. Filter: Grok is dropped, DeepSearch has no document-export path.
  3. Survivors: Gemini (AI Pro $19.99, 300 runs), ChatGPT (Plus $20, 25), Perplexity (Pro $20, 500), Claude (Pro $20, 100).
  4. Rank (academic = report depth → export → citations): Gemini and ChatGPT tie on depth; Gemini's Google Docs export breaks the tie.
  5. Result: recommend Gemini Deep Research; runner-up ChatGPT Deep Research.

Free real-time news, free tier, news use case

A freelance journalist wants breaking-news research without paying, at roughly one run a day (≈30/month).

  1. Inputs: free tier = on, use case = News & real-time, min runs = 30.
  2. Filter: only Perplexity (free ≈150/mo) and Grok (free ≈90/mo) have a free deep-research tier; ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude are dropped as paywalled.
  3. Rank (news = live-web freshness first): Grok reads X and the live web (freshness 5) above Perplexity (4).
  4. Result: recommend Grok DeepSearch; runner-up Perplexity. A citation caveat is surfaced on the card, verify Grok's sources.

Edge case, $19.99 budget (fractional boundary)

A shoestring budget set one cent below $20 shows how the filter treats an exact price boundary, and never returns a blank result.

  1. Inputs: budget = $19.99, use case = Academic report, min runs = 10, no toggles.
  2. The $20 plans (ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro) are just over budget and drop out; ChatGPT and Claude have no free deep tier to fall back on.
  3. Perplexity and Grok still qualify through their free ($0) tier; Gemini AI Pro sits exactly at $19.99.
  4. Rank (academic depth): Gemini 5 > Perplexity 4 > Grok 3.
  5. Result: recommend Gemini; runner-up Perplexity. Negative or above-$300 budgets return a clear error, not a silent zero.

Frequently asked questions

Sources & references

Related tools

Comments & feedback

Spotted a bug or want an improvement? Tell us, our team reviews every comment, and good ideas get built. Comments are public and anonymous.

Spot a stale limit, a changed price, or a missing tool?

Email me at [email protected] , most fixes ship within 24 hours.