induwara.lk
induwara.lkAI · Deep research

AI Deep Research Comparison — ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Perplexity vs Claude vs Grok

Compare the 5 agentic deep-research modes side by side — price, free-tier runs, monthly run limits, citations, report length and document export. Set your budget and use case for a single best-fit pick. Every figure cites its official source.

By Induwara AshinsanaUpdated Jul 5, 2026
Find your deep-research tool5 tools
Quick scenarios

Your needs

$

Consumer plans only. Range $0–$300.

Report depth, document export, then citation quality.

Whole number. How many deep reports you'll run monthly.

Must-have features

Best match

RecommendedGemini Deep Research· Google
Google AI Pro plan
$19.99/mo
Runs / month
300
Indicative LKR
Rs 5,997/mo

Gemini Deep Research leads for academic work on report depth and export to Google Docs, at $19.99/mo.

Official source
Runner-upChatGPT Deep ResearchPlus · $20.00/mo · 25 runs/mo

Full comparison

ToolDeep research from
ChatGPT Deep Research
OpenAI
OpenAI o3 / GPT-5 deep-research model
$20.00/mo
Gemini Deep Research
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro (Deep Research agent)
$19.99/mo
Perplexity Deep Research
Perplexity AI
In-house reasoning stack over Sonar + frontier models
Free
Claude Research
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5 / Sonnet 4.5 (Research mode)
$20.00/mo
Grok DeepSearch
xAI
Grok 4 (DeepSearch agent)
Free

Each row's claims trace to its official source — see the Sources section below the tool.

AI search vs deep research

AI search answers in seconds from a handful of pages — great for a quick fact with a couple of links.

Deep researchruns an agent for several minutes across tens of sources and returns a long, structured, cited report. It's what this page compares.

Static comparison — nothing is sent to any AI provider.

The recommender only filters and ranks the figures below in your browser; no account, key or query leaves this page. Vendor limits change fast — every figure is dated (2026-07-05) and links to its official source. LKR is indicative at Rs 300/USD.

How it works

“Deep research” is the agentic mode in a chatbot that spends several minutes reading tens of web pages and then writes a long, structured, cited report — a different job from quick AI search, which answers in seconds from a handful of pages. This page lines up the five modes a Sri Lankan student, analyst or freelancer actually chooses between: ChatGPT Deep Research, Gemini Deep Research, Perplexity Deep Research, Claude Research and Grok DeepSearch.

1. The dataset

The comparison is a curated, cited table — not a benchmark and not an opinion score. Each row records the underlying model, the cheapest plan that unlocks deep research, the free-tier allowance, the paid run limit, typical report length, citation style, export targets, private-data connectors and real-time-web access, taken straight from the vendor's own pages. Because deep-research limits change often, every figure is dated with a 2026-07-05 LAST_VERIFIED stamp.

2. The recommender

The tool is a transparent, rules-based recommender — no live API calls, no scoring model. It runs in two steps:

  1. Filter.For each tool it finds the cheapest plan whose price is within your budget, whose monthly run limit meets your minimum, and — if you asked — is free. Tools without document export or private connectors are dropped when you require those. A tool with no qualifying plan is set aside as a “near miss” with the exact constraint it failed.
  2. Rank.Survivors are sorted by a key order tied to your use case — Academic report leads on report depth then export then citation quality; Market research leads on runs per month then sources per run; News & real-time leads on live-web freshness. Ties break by lower price, then more runs.

The top survivor becomes the recommendation and the second the runner-up. If nothing clears every filter, the tool shows the nearest options and which constraint each fails, so the page never dead-ends.

3. The LKR line is indicative

The recommendation card multiplies the USD plan price by a fixed CBSL middle rate of Rs 300per USD to show an approximate rupee cost. This is a constant, not a live feed — your bank's rate plus FX margin will differ by a few percent. For a live USD-to-LKR rate with Wise, Payoneer and Skrill fees, use the Freelancer USD-LKR calculator in Related tools.

4. Cross-checks

The data module exports verifyWorkedExamples() — which recomputes the worked examples below, including the fractional budget, negative-input error, runs-boundary and no-match cases — and verifyDatasetIntegrity(), which asserts unique ids, non-negative prices and runs, axis scores in range, and an https source on every row. A typo in a quarterly price update fails a test instead of shipping silently.

Worked examples

Undergrad literature review — $20, academic, needs export

A UCSC final-year student has Rs 6,000/month and wants a long cited report they can drop into a document, with at least 10 runs a month.

  1. Inputs: budget = $20, use case = Academic report, document export = on, min runs = 10.
  2. Filter: Grok is dropped — DeepSearch has no document-export path.
  3. Survivors: Gemini (AI Pro $19.99, 300 runs), ChatGPT (Plus $20, 25), Perplexity (Pro $20, 500), Claude (Pro $20, 100).
  4. Rank (academic = report depth → export → citations): Gemini and ChatGPT tie on depth; Gemini's Google Docs export breaks the tie.
  5. Result: recommend Gemini Deep Research; runner-up ChatGPT Deep Research.

Free real-time news — free tier, news use case

A freelance journalist wants breaking-news research without paying, at roughly one run a day (≈30/month).

  1. Inputs: free tier = on, use case = News & real-time, min runs = 30.
  2. Filter: only Perplexity (free ≈150/mo) and Grok (free ≈90/mo) have a free deep-research tier; ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude are dropped as paywalled.
  3. Rank (news = live-web freshness first): Grok reads X and the live web (freshness 5) above Perplexity (4).
  4. Result: recommend Grok DeepSearch; runner-up Perplexity. A citation caveat is surfaced on the card — verify Grok's sources.

Edge case — $19.99 budget (fractional boundary)

A shoestring budget set one cent below $20 shows how the filter treats an exact price boundary — and never returns a blank result.

  1. Inputs: budget = $19.99, use case = Academic report, min runs = 10, no toggles.
  2. The $20 plans (ChatGPT Plus, Claude Pro) are just over budget and drop out; ChatGPT and Claude have no free deep tier to fall back on.
  3. Perplexity and Grok still qualify through their free ($0) tier; Gemini AI Pro sits exactly at $19.99.
  4. Rank (academic depth): Gemini 5 > Perplexity 4 > Grok 3.
  5. Result: recommend Gemini; runner-up Perplexity. Negative or above-$300 budgets return a clear error, not a silent zero.

Frequently asked questions

Sources & references

Related tools

Rate this tool
Be the first to rate

Comments & feedback

Spotted a bug or want an improvement? Tell us — our team reviews every comment, and good ideas get built. Comments are public and anonymous.

Spot a stale limit, a changed price, or a missing tool?

Email me at [email protected] — most fixes ship within 24 hours.