Skip to content
induwara.lk
Premium
induwara.lkResearch · Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha Calculator

Paste your survey scores and get Cronbach's alpha, the internal-consistency reliability of your scale, in one step — plus item-total correlations and "alpha if item deleted" for every question. Runs entirely in your browser; no upload, no signup.

By Induwara AshinsanaUpdated Jul 12, 2026
Cronbach's alpha calculator

Paste straight from Excel, Google Sheets, or SPSS. Cells can be separated by tabs, commas, or spaces. Rows with a blank or non-numeric cell are excluded (listwise).

Variance basis
Sample data
Cronbach's alpha
0.84
Good
Items (k)
3
Columns analysed
Valid respondents (n)
5
All rows complete
Mean inter-item r
0.64
Average item correlation
Σ item variances (÷n−1)
3.300
Total-score variance (÷n−1)
7.500
Mean of totals
11.00

Per-item diagnostics

ItemMeanVarianceItem-total rα if deleted
Item 13.601.3000.8910.57
Item 23.800.7000.5790.89
Item 33.601.3000.7000.79

Red item-total correlations are below 0.30; a red "α if deleted" exceeds the overall alpha, meaning removing that item would raise reliability.

α = 0.84 Good. Strong internal consistency; the scale is reliable for research use. Removing Item 2 would raise alpha to 0.89, so review that item before your full study.

Method: α = (k/(k−1))·(1 − Σσ²ᵢ/σ²ₜ) — Cronbach (1951). Interpretation bands from George & Mallery (2003). Corrected item-total correlations use the sum of the other k−1 items. Nothing leaves this page.

How it works

Cronbach's alpha estimates internal consistency — how closely a set of items measures the same underlying construct. It is the standard reliability coefficient reported for Likert-scale questionnaires in psychology, education, nursing, and management research. The calculator uses the original definition from Cronbach (1951).

Let k be the number of items (columns) and n the number of respondents (rows). For each item i, compute its variance σ²ᵢ across respondents. For each respondent, add their item scores into a total Tⱼ, then compute the variance of those totals, σ²ₜ. The coefficient is:

α = (k / (k − 1)) · (1 − Σσ²ᵢ / σ²ₜ)

Because both variances use the same divisor, the choice of the sample (n−1) or population (n) formula cancels in the ratio — alpha is the same either way, so the toggle only changes the variances shown for reference. Alpha rises when items covary strongly (a large total variance relative to the sum of item variances) and when the scale has more items.

For each item the tool also reports the corrected item-total correlation: the Pearson correlation between that item and the sum of the other k−1 items. Values below about 0.30 mark an item that does not fit the scale — often a poorly worded or reverse-coded question. The alpha-if-deleted column drops each item in turn and recomputes alpha on the rest; when a deleted value exceeds the overall alpha, removing that item would raise reliability, so it is flagged.

An optional standardized alphais derived from the mean of the pairwise inter-item correlations r̄ using α_std = (k·r̄)/(1 + (k−1)·r̄); it is preferred when items sit on different response ranges. Results are interpreted with the George & Mallery (2003) bands — α ≥ 0.9 Excellent down to below 0.5 Unacceptable. Alpha can be negative (typically a mis-keyed item) and, for a constant set of totals, is undefined; the tool reports both cases explicitly rather than showing a misleading zero.

Worked examples

3 items, 5 respondents (Likert 1–5)

  1. Data: [4,5,4] [3,3,4] [5,4,5] [2,3,2] [4,4,3]
  2. Item variances (÷n): 1.04, 0.56, 1.04 → Σσ²ᵢ = 2.64
  3. Totals: 13, 10, 14, 7, 11 → variance σ²ₜ = 6.00
  4. α = (3/2) · (1 − 2.64/6.00) = 1.5 × 0.56
  5. α = 0.84 → Good internal consistency

Alpha if item 2 is deleted (leaves items 1 and 3, k = 2)

  1. Remaining item variances: 1.04 + 1.04 = 2.08
  2. New totals (I1+I3): 8, 7, 10, 4, 7 → variance = 3.76
  3. α = (2/1) · (1 − 2.08/3.76) = 2 × 0.4468
  4. α = 0.89 — higher than 0.84
  5. So item 2 is the weakest; reword or drop it before the full study.

Standardized alpha sanity check (k = 3, mean r̄ = 0.60)

  1. Standardized α = (k · r̄) / (1 + (k − 1) · r̄)
  2. = (3 × 0.60) / (1 + 2 × 0.60)
  3. = 1.80 / 2.20
  4. = 0.818 → Good
  5. Consistent in magnitude with the raw alpha above.

Frequently asked questions

Sources & references

Related tools

Rate this tool
Be the first to rate

Comments & feedback

Spotted a bug or want an improvement? Tell us — our team reviews every comment, and good ideas get built. Comments are public and anonymous.

Found a bug, edge case, or want to suggest an improvement?

Email me at [email protected] — most fixes ship within 24 hours.