Skip to content
induwara.lk
Premium
induwara.lkAI · Legal risk

AI Copyright Indemnity Checker — Will Your AI Provider Defend You?

Pick your AI provider, plan tier, content type and use — this checker tells you whether the vendor will defend you and pay if your generated content triggers a third-party copyright claim, with the scope, any cap, the conditions to stay covered, and a link to the governing terms. Covers 10 providers across 19 tiers. Informational, not legal advice.

By Induwara AshinsanaUpdated Jul 17, 2026
Check your AI copyright indemnity

Plain-English summaries of each provider's public terms — general information, not legal advice. Terms change; open the linked official terms before you ship AI work. Verified 2026-07-17.

Plan tier

Only the tiers this provider documents are shown.

Content type
Intended use

ChatGPT / OpenAI API · ChatGPT Free/Plus · Text

This tier carries no copyright indemnity — the liability is yours.

Not covered
Indemnity scope

No indemnity on this tier

Payout cap

Not applicable

Why

  • Copyright Shield does not apply to consumer ChatGPT Free or Plus.
  • IP liability for the output stays with you under the consumer Terms of Use.
Read the governing terms for ChatGPT / OpenAI API

Compare all providers

Text · Commercial client work
ServiceTierVerdictCapSource
ChatGPT / OpenAI APIChatGPT Free/PlusNot coveredNot applicableTerms
ChatGPT / OpenAI APIOpenAI APICoveredCapped (see conditions)Terms
ChatGPT / OpenAI APIChatGPT Enterprise/TeamCoveredCapped (see conditions)Terms
Microsoft Copilot / Azure OpenAICopilot (consumer/free)Not coveredNot applicableTerms
Microsoft Copilot / Azure OpenAIMicrosoft 365 CopilotConditionally coveredUncappedTerms
Microsoft Copilot / Azure OpenAIAzure OpenAI ServiceConditionally coveredUncappedTerms
GitHub CopilotCopilot Free / Pro (individual)Not coveredNot applicableTerms
GitHub CopilotCopilot Business/EnterpriseNot coveredUncappedTerms
Google Gemini / Vertex AIGemini app (consumer)Not coveredNot applicableTerms
Google Gemini / Vertex AIVertex AI / Google CloudCoveredCapped (see conditions)Terms
ClaudeClaude Free/Pro (consumer)Not coveredNot applicableTerms
ClaudeClaude for Work / API (commercial)CoveredCapped (see conditions)Terms
Amazon BedrockAmazon-built models (Titan / Nova)CoveredUncappedTerms
Amazon BedrockThird-party models on BedrockNot statedNot applicableTerms
Adobe FireflyFirefly (free / Creative Cloud individual)Not coveredNot applicableTerms
Adobe FireflyFirefly for EnterpriseNot coveredUncappedTerms
MidjourneyAll plansNot coveredNot applicableTerms
Stability AI (Stable Diffusion)Community / MembershipNot coveredNot applicableTerms
Open-weights models (self-hosted)Self-hostedNot coveredNot applicableTerms

Each row links the provider's governing terms. Indemnity fields are summarised from those terms as of 2026-07-17; the full source list is below the tool. This is general information, not legal advice.

How it works

This is a lookup-and-decision tool, not a calculator. Each AI provider is a record with one or more plan tiers, and every tier stores facts taken from that provider's published legal terms: whether it offers a copyright indemnity (the promise to defend you and pay the costs of a third-party IP claim), what that indemnity covers, which content types it applies to, whether the payout is capped, and the conditionsyou must meet. The tool never guesses: where a provider is silent, the tier reads "Not stated" and asks you to check the terms.

Your content type and intended use then decide the verdict chip. The derivation is deterministic and applied in order:

  1. If the tier offers no indemnityNot covered. This is every consumer/free tier here — ChatGPT Free/Plus, consumer Copilot, the Gemini app, Claude Free/Pro, GitHub Copilot Individual, Midjourney, Stability AI and self-hosted open-weights models.
  2. If the terms are silentNot stated(for example third-party models running on Amazon Bedrock, which follow their own providers' terms rather than the AWS indemnity).
  3. If your content type is outside what the indemnity covers → Not covered, and the card names the types that are covered. GitHub Copilot's commitment, for instance, covers generated code, not images.
  4. If the indemnity is commercial-only and you picked personal use → Not covered. These shields exist to back business customers, not hobby projects.
  5. If the indemnity is conditional Conditionally covered, and the conditions are listed — most commonly "keep the content filters and guardrails on" and "don't try to generate infringing content."
  6. Otherwise → Covered. Even here the standing conditions are shown, because every real indemnity requires guardrails-on and no willful infringement.

To keep the dataset honest, the build runs two internal cross-checks. The first re-derives every tier's verdict a second way — mapping the indemnity flag to a base verdict, then applying the content-type and commercial-only gates through an independent code path — and asserts the two agree across all 19tiers, four content types and three uses. The second checks internal invariants, such as "a tier with no indemnity must not claim a payout cap." The "10 providers · 19tiers cross-checked" badge means both pass. Everything runs in your browser over a static, dated snapshot — no API calls, no scraping of live terms.

Worked examples

Colombo studio: ad copy drafted in ChatGPT Free for a client, Text

  1. Inputs → Provider: ChatGPT / OpenAI API, Tier: ChatGPT Free/Plus, Content: Text, Use: Commercial client work.
  2. Indemnity: none — Copyright Shield excludes consumer tiers.
  3. Rule 1 fires (no indemnity) ⇒ verdict = NOT COVERED.
  4. Comparison table flags OpenAI API and ChatGPT Enterprise/Team as Covered for Text.
  5. Verdict: ❌ move the workflow to the API or an Enterprise plan before delivery.

Design agency: an Adobe Firefly image for a client, enterprise plan

  1. Inputs → Provider: Adobe Firefly, Tier: Firefly for Enterprise, Content: Image, Use: Commercial client work.
  2. Indemnity: yes; scope = training-data + generated-output; content types = [Image].
  3. Image ∈ covered types and use is commercial (not personal) ⇒ Rule 6 → verdict = COVERED.
  4. Payout cap: Uncapped. Condition: enterprise agreement in force, use Firefly-generated output.
  5. Verdict: ✅ covered and uncapped for the enterprise image workflow.

Edge case — a Copilot Business team asks about a generated image, not code

  1. Inputs → Provider: GitHub Copilot, Tier: Copilot Business/Enterprise, Content: Image, Use: Commercial client work.
  2. Indemnity: conditional — but its scope covers code only.
  3. Image ∉ covered types [Code] ⇒ Rule 3 → verdict = NOT COVERED for this content type.
  4. The card names what IS covered: Code (with the duplication-detection filter enabled).
  5. Verdict: ❌ the Copilot commitment doesn't reach images — use an image-indemnified tool for that asset.

Frequently asked questions

Sources & references

Related tools

Rate this tool
Be the first to rate

Comments & feedback

Spotted a bug or want an improvement? Tell us — our team reviews every comment, and good ideas get built. Comments are public and anonymous.

Spotted a provider whose indemnity terms changed, or one we should add?

Email me at [email protected] — most fixes ship within 24 hours.