induwara.lk
induwara.lkEducation · English tests

English Test Score Converter — IELTS, TOEFL, PTE, Duolingo & CEFR

Enter a score on any one English proficiency test and see its official equivalent on the others — IELTS ⇄ TOEFL iBT ⇄ PTE Academic ⇄ Duolingo ⇄ CEFR. Every mapping uses the provider's own concordance table, shown as ranges, with sources cited. No signup, no ads.

By Induwara AshinsanaUpdated Jul 9, 2026
Convert an English test scoreIELTS · TOEFL · PTE · Duolingo · CEFR

Overall band, 0–9 in half-point steps.

Popular
CEFR levelB2(≈ IELTS 6.5)

Independent user — interacts with fluency and writes clear, detailed text on many subjects.

TOEFL iBT
79–93
published as a range
PTE Academic
58
Duolingo English Test
105–110
published as a range
CEFR level
B2

Full concordance

IELTSTOEFL iBTPTEDuolingoCEFR
4.532–342965–70B1
5.035–453675–80B1
5.546–594285–90B2
6.060–785095–100B2
6.579–9358105–110B2
7.094–10165115–120C1
7.5102–10973125–135C1
8.0110–11479140–150C1
8.5115–11783151–155C2
9.0118–12089160C2

Concordances are official but approximate. Each institution sets its own accepted tests and minimums — always confirm on the course or visa page. Sources: IELTS · TOEFL · PTE · Duolingo · CEFR.

How it works

There is no single physics that links these tests — each is scored on its own scale (IELTS 0–9, TOEFL iBT 0–120, PTE Academic 10–90, Duolingo 10–160, CEFR A1–C2). What exists is a set of concordance tables: each provider has statistically linked its own scale to the others, most commonly to IELTS. This tool uses IELTS band as the common anchor because every other provider publishes an official IELTS concordance.

  1. Normalise to an IELTS band.If you enter IELTS, that band is used directly. If you enter TOEFL, PTE, or Duolingo, the tool looks up the provider's published row that contains your score — for example ETS maps TOEFL iBT 94–101 to IELTS 7.0, and Pearson maps PTE 65 to IELTS 7.0. A CEFR level maps to the IELTS band range for that level (C1 = IELTS 7.0–8.0).
  2. Project the anchor band back out. Using the same provider tables in reverse, the tool returns the equivalent on every other scale — a single value where the table is one-to-one (PTE 65) and a range where a band maps to several scores (TOEFL 94–101 for IELTS 7.0).
  3. Read the CEFR level. The Council of Europe framework is carried alongside every result: C2 ≈ IELTS 8.5–9.0, C1 ≈ 7.0–8.0, B2 ≈ 5.5–6.5, B1 ≈ 4.5–5.0. Each result shows the one-line Council-of-Europe descriptor for that level.

No value is interpolated or invented between published rows. Where a provider only publishes banded ranges, the tool shows the range rather than a false-precision single number — because the providers themselves label these tables approximate. When a score falls between two published bands, the tool snaps to the nearest anchor band and flags the result as approximate. Three published worked examples are re-checked against the source tables at build time as a self-test (verifyWorkedExamples()), and a round-trip check confirms the forward and reverse tables agree.

Worked examples

IELTS 6.5 — the most common Sri Lankan result

  1. Source = IELTS 6.5 → used directly as the anchor band.
  2. Project out (ETS / Pearson / Duolingo tables):
  3. TOEFL iBT 79–93 · PTE Academic 58 · Duolingo 105–110
  4. CEFR level: B2 (independent user).
  5. So an IELTS 6.5 applicant meets a “PTE 58 / TOEFL 79” requirement.

TOEFL iBT 100 — normalising up to IELTS

  1. Source = TOEFL iBT 100. ETS row 94–101 contains it → IELTS 7.0.
  2. Project out from IELTS 7.0:
  3. PTE Academic 65 · Duolingo 115–120 · CEFR C1.
  4. A TOEFL 100 candidate therefore meets an “IELTS 7.0 / PTE 65” course requirement.

PTE Academic 50 — a borderline band

  1. Source = PTE 50. Pearson's concordance point 50 → IELTS 6.0.
  2. Project out from IELTS 6.0:
  3. TOEFL iBT 60–78 · Duolingo 95–100 · CEFR B2.
  4. PTE 50 sits at the B2 floor — one band below a typical “6.5” admission bar.

Frequently asked questions

Sources & references

The concordance tables on this page were last cross-checked against the provider sources on 2026-07-09. Providers revise these tables periodically; this page is reviewed whenever a provider publishes an updated concordance.

Related tools

Rate this tool
Be the first to rate

Comments & feedback

Spotted a bug or want an improvement? Tell us — our team reviews every comment, and good ideas get built. Comments are public and anonymous.

Spotted a concordance that's out of date, or want another scale added?

Email me at [email protected] — most fixes ship within 24 hours.